in

HyperX SoloCast Review | Compact, simple, affordable, and sounds great 2021

Does it strip out too many features, or strike a nice balance? The HyperX SoloCast is a very well made, if a little barebones recording microphone. It’s perfect for Zoom-bound workers, though recording artist might want to spring for something a little more substantial.

The HyperX Solocast is a budget option microphone, and it features some nice features that are rare at this price point to improve your user experience. It also comes with a build quality and user-friendly interface that might impress you.

  • Hyperx solocast vs razer seiren mini
  • Hyperx solocast software
  • Hyperx solocast review
  • Hyperx solocast best settings
  • Hyperx solocast drivers
  • Hyperx solocast amazon
  • Hyperx solocast reddit
  • Hyperx solocast uk

In this review, we’re going to be taking a closer look at the HyperX SoloCast. We’ll be going over key features, who this product is for, how it compares to the competition, and most importantly, is it right for you?

We’ll break down all the aspects of the HyperX Solocast, what you can expect to get in return for your money, and help you to decide if the HyperX SoloCast Microphone is the right option for you.

Buy From Amazon: HyperX Solocast

HyperX SoloCast Review

Pros: good built construction; good voice recording quality; great bass range; decent highs.
Cons: no pop protection included; strong noise transmission (decoupling); few functions; no headphone connection. – Summarized by our editorial team

Simple and affordable, the HyperX SoloCast is a compact and easy to use microphone aimed at streamers and content creators.

Buy Boom Arm Amazon: Visit Site

Also Read: Razer Seiren Mini Review

There are not many accessories included: HyperX delivers the Solocast with a two meter long USB-C cable and a small stand. A pop screen is missing – if you sit on the zero axis and very close to the microphone, one would be appropriate. The stand is made of plastic, can be easily tilted backwards and to the side, but reacts quite clearly to vibrations according to “TopWhich.com”. Together with the mounting ring for the microphone, which is only lightly rubberized on the inside, this leads to weak decoupling and therefore to disturbances in the event of vibration. Typing on a keyboard next to the microphone becomes a problem. Further points of criticism: A noise filter is missing and the level is too low. It’s a shame, because the recording quality is fundamentally convincing. Can you live with the disadvantages mentioned,

Design and workmanship

With an MSRP of $59.99, the Solocast from the peripheral manufacturer HyperX, which belongs to the increasingly popular category of mini USB microphones, is less than half as expensive as the last tested Wave: 3 from Elgato (test). With this, the cheaper representatives have some similarities, but even more differences.

The package contents of the present test candidate are also very manageable: apart from the microphone itself, it also includes a small detachable stand and a two-meter USB Type-C cable. While the Wave: 3 has to be screwed to a larger microphone stand using the adapter supplied and the swiveling bracket, the Solocast is attached directly to it. Here, too, a 3/8 ” or 5/8 ” thread serves as a connection. Additional accessories, for example in the form of pop protection, are not included.

Almost exclusively plastic

With its appearance and a total weight of around 429 g, the Solocast looks very massive. In contrast to the Wave: 3, however, it is made almost entirely of plastic. Only the microphone protection is made of metal, the same applies to the small weight under the base plate, which gives the microphone stand the necessary mass so that it does not tip over with the slightest movement.

The arm on which the microphone is hooked can be tilted backwards by around 45 degrees, to the side it is 45 and 90 degrees. The screw attached to the joint also ensures a safe and stable locking. A marking is attached both to the microphone itself and to the holder for better orientation so that the recording unit can always be inserted facing forward. Nevertheless, the Wave: 3 has a bit more flexibility in terms of alignment.

The inside of the mounting ring is lightly rubberized for decoupling, which is intended to prevent vibrations emanating from the base. This appears to be necessary in particular because the microphone already presents itself as a shaky affair in which a tap on a keyboard is sufficient to produce clearly visible movements.

Little equipment

On the back of the sound pick-up is the USB Type-C port, which transmits data in accordance with USB 2.0. On the top side there is again the microphone muting, the activation of which is indicated by the capacitive sensor via the red LED light on the front: If the red LED light is constantly lit, the microphone is open, if the LED is flashing, it is muted. Muting does not lead to unwanted noise.

A headphone connection for latency-free monitoring is missing, as are other options for adjusting the recording volume or noise suppression. The same applies to an analog connection, making the Solocast a pure USB microphone. The user must therefore rely on the converters installed by the manufacturer and cannot improve the quality via a higher-quality audio interface if necessary.

Technical minimum

According to HyperX, the Solocast is primarily aimed at streamers and “content creators” who, with its cardioid characteristic, should enable the greatest possible range of use. The electret condenser microphone enables recordings with a sampling rate of 8 kHz, 16 kHz, 32 kHz, 44.1 kHz and 48 kHz with a resolution of 16 bit. The first restrictions compared to higher-priced representatives such as the Wave: 3, which offers recordings of up to 96 kHz at 24 bit, are already evident here. According to the manufacturer, the frequency range should be 20 Hz to 20 kHz.

Also Read: United States Top 10 Movies & TV Series on Netflix

Like many of its competitors, the Solocast is a pure mono microphone, even if the recording is output via two channels. Spatial location of the voice, for example when two people are talking, is therefore not possible. There are also no additional functions implemented in hardware, such as noise suppression, filters or protection against overload.

Is the HyperX SoloCast good for gaming?

For video editors, streamers, and gamers looking for a USB microphone with great sound quality, the HyperX SoloCast is a must have. Certified by TeamSpeak and Discord and compatible with OBS, XSplit, Streamlabs OBS and a number of other programs, it’s an extremely streamer-friendly microphone.

HyperX also does not provide software that enables basic control and the filtering of background noises and noise. The Solocast is certified for both Discord and TeamSpeak and should also work with various streaming platforms such as Streamlabs OBS, OBS Studio or Xsplit. In addition, the microphone can be connected to any common DAW (“ Digital Audio Workstation ”). Any sound interventions must then be carried out via this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Razer Seiren Mini Review | Best settings & Seiren vs Blue yeti 2021

Razer Huntsman V2 Review